# Resume-Matcher vs wraft

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Resume-Matcher | wraft |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 ✓ | 44/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 12 in Document Processing | #35 of 46 in Document Management |
| GitHub stars | 28 916 ✓ | 167 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +408 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 ✓ | 3 |
| Latest release | v1.4.0 · 21 Oct 2026 ✓ | v0.6.7 · 25 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Elixir |

## Which one should you pick?

Resume-Matcher scores 81/100 against 44/100 for wraft, so it is the safer default.

Resume-Matcher ships more often: 5 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for wraft.

If you want the quickest setup, Resume-Matcher is easier to run; wraft needs more configuration.

Resume-Matcher is growing faster right now (+408 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Resume-Matcher](https://selfhost.directory/project/resume-matcher) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/resume-matcher.md)
- [wraft](https://selfhost.directory/project/wraft) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/wraft.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/resume-matcher-vs-wraft