Resume-MatchervsTube Archivist
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Resume-Matcher | Tube Archivist | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 | 72/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 12 in Document Processing | #7 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 28 917 | 8 552 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +403 | +83 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 | 6 |
| Latest release | v1.4.0 · 21 Oct 2026 | v0.6.0 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Resume-Matcher scores 81/100 against 72/100 for Tube Archivist, so it is the safer default.
Tube Archivist ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for Resume-Matcher.
If you want the quickest setup, Resume-Matcher is easier to run; Tube Archivist needs more configuration.
Resume-Matcher is growing faster right now (+403 stars in 30 days).
Resume-Matcher details →Tube Archivist details →
Swap a project
Keep Resume-Matcher, compare it with
Keep Tube Archivist, compare it with