# restic-rest-server vs uptime-kuma

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | restic-rest-server | uptime-kuma |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 60/100 | 88/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #18 of 46 in Backup | #3 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 1 531 | 93 024 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +35 | +1 277 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 19 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | 2.5.8 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | BSD-2-Clause | MIT |
| Main language | Go | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

uptime-kuma scores 88/100 against 60/100 for restic-rest-server, so it is the safer default.

uptime-kuma ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for restic-rest-server.

uptime-kuma is growing faster right now (+1 277 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [restic-rest-server](https://selfhost.directory/project/restic-rest-server) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/restic-rest-server.md)
- [uptime-kuma](https://selfhost.directory/project/uptime-kuma) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/uptime-kuma.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/restic-rest-server-vs-uptime-kuma