restic-rest-servervsShinobi
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| restic-rest-server | Shinobi | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 60/100 | 66/100 |
| Rank in category | #18 of 46 in Backup | #3 of 24 in Video Surveillance |
| GitHub stars | 1 531 | — |
| Stars, last 30 days | +35 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | BSD-2-Clause | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | — |
Which one should you pick?
Shinobi scores 66/100 against 60/100 for restic-rest-server, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, restic-rest-server is easier to run; Shinobi needs more configuration.
restic-rest-server is growing faster right now (+35 stars in 30 days).
restic-rest-server details →Shinobi details →