# restic-rest-server vs SeaweedFS

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | restic-rest-server | SeaweedFS |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 60/100 | 81/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #18 of 46 in Backup | #1 of 11 in Cloud Storage |
| GitHub stars | 1 531 | 35 789 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +35 | +864 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 28 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | 4.51 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | BSD-2-Clause | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

SeaweedFS scores 81/100 against 60/100 for restic-rest-server, so it is the safer default.

SeaweedFS ships more often: 28 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for restic-rest-server.

If you want the quickest setup, restic-rest-server is easier to run; SeaweedFS needs more configuration.

SeaweedFS is growing faster right now (+864 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [restic-rest-server](https://selfhost.directory/project/restic-rest-server) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/restic-rest-server.md)
- [SeaweedFS](https://selfhost.directory/project/seaweedfs) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/seaweedfs.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/restic-rest-server-vs-seaweedfs