# ResourceSpace vs Zero-K

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | ResourceSpace | Zero-K |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 64/100 ✓ | 62/100 |
| Rank in category | #15 of 142 in Media Management | #2 of 23 in Gaming |
| GitHub stars | — | 877 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +26 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | GPL-2.0 |
| Main language | — | Lua |

## Which one should you pick?

ResourceSpace scores 64/100 against 62/100 for Zero-K, so it is the safer default.

If you want the quickest setup, Zero-K is easier to run; ResourceSpace needs more configuration.

Zero-K is growing faster right now (+26 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [ResourceSpace](https://selfhost.directory/project/resourcespace) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/resourcespace.md)
- [Zero-K](https://selfhost.directory/project/zero-k) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/zero-k.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/resourcespace-vs-zero-k