ResourceSpacevsZammad
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| ResourceSpace | Zammad | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 64/100 | 70/100 |
| Rank in category | #15 of 142 in Media Management | #1 of 9 in Helpdesk |
| GitHub stars | — | 6 050 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +103 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | — | Ruby |
Which one should you pick?
Zammad scores 70/100 against 64/100 for ResourceSpace, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, ResourceSpace is easier to run; Zammad needs more configuration.
Zammad is growing faster right now (+103 stars in 30 days).
ResourceSpace details →Zammad details →