# ResourceSpace vs Workout.cool

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | ResourceSpace | Workout.cool |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 64/100 | 66/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #15 of 142 in Media Management | #2 of 11 in Fitness Tracker |
| GitHub stars | — | 8 650 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +155 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 1 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v1.3.2 · 7 Dec 2025 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | MIT |
| Main language | — | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Workout.cool scores 66/100 against 64/100 for ResourceSpace, so it is the safer default.

Workout.cool ships more often: 1 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for ResourceSpace.

If you want the quickest setup, Workout.cool is easier to run; ResourceSpace needs more configuration.

Workout.cool is growing faster right now (+155 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [ResourceSpace](https://selfhost.directory/project/resourcespace) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/resourcespace.md)
- [Workout.cool](https://selfhost.directory/project/workout-cool) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/workout-cool.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/resourcespace-vs-workout-cool