# ResourceSpace vs Wastebin

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | ResourceSpace | Wastebin |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 64/100 ✓ | 56/100 |
| Rank in category | #15 of 142 in Media Management | #4 of 19 in Pastebins |
| GitHub stars | — | 880 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +20 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 11 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | 3.9.0 · 15 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | MIT |
| Main language | — | Rust |

## Which one should you pick?

ResourceSpace scores 64/100 against 56/100 for Wastebin, so it is the safer default.

Wastebin ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for ResourceSpace.

If you want the quickest setup, Wastebin is easier to run; ResourceSpace needs more configuration.

Wastebin is growing faster right now (+20 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [ResourceSpace](https://selfhost.directory/project/resourcespace) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/resourcespace.md)
- [Wastebin](https://selfhost.directory/project/wastebin) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/wastebin.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/resourcespace-vs-wastebin