ResourceSpacevsTypesense
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| ResourceSpace | Typesense | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 64/100 | 79/100 |
| Rank in category | #15 of 142 in Media Management | #6 of 41 in Search Engines |
| GitHub stars | — | 27 059 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +473 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 4 |
| Latest release | — | v30.2 · 19 Apr 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | — | C |
Which one should you pick?
Typesense scores 79/100 against 64/100 for ResourceSpace, so it is the safer default.
Typesense ships more often: 4 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for ResourceSpace.
If you want the quickest setup, Typesense is easier to run; ResourceSpace needs more configuration.
Typesense is growing faster right now (+473 stars in 30 days).
ResourceSpace details →Typesense details →