ResourceSpacevsTasmota
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| ResourceSpace | Tasmota | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 64/100 | 79/100 |
| Rank in category | #15 of 142 in Media Management | #3 of 104 in Home Automation |
| GitHub stars | — | 24 941 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +169 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 6 |
| Latest release | — | v16.0.0 · 16 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | — | C |
Which one should you pick?
Tasmota scores 79/100 against 64/100 for ResourceSpace, so it is the safer default.
Tasmota ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for ResourceSpace.
If you want the quickest setup, ResourceSpace is easier to run; Tasmota needs more configuration.
Tasmota is growing faster right now (+169 stars in 30 days).
ResourceSpace details →Tasmota details →