# ResourceSpace vs Stirling-PDF

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | ResourceSpace | Stirling-PDF |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 64/100 | 87/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #15 of 142 in Media Management | #1 of 46 in Document Management |
| GitHub stars | — | 95 252 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +2 339 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 25 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v3.2.2 · 24 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | Other |
| Main language | — | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Stirling-PDF scores 87/100 against 64/100 for ResourceSpace, so it is the safer default.

Stirling-PDF ships more often: 25 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for ResourceSpace.

Stirling-PDF is growing faster right now (+2 339 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [ResourceSpace](https://selfhost.directory/project/resourcespace) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/resourcespace.md)
- [Stirling-PDF](https://selfhost.directory/project/stirling-pdf) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/stirling-pdf.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/resourcespace-vs-stirling-pdf