ResourceSpacevsStash
Two self-hosted Media Management projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| ResourceSpace | Stash | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 64/100 | 78/100 |
| Rank in category | #15 of 142 in Media Management | #2 of 142 in Media Management |
| GitHub stars | — | 13 306 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +300 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 7 |
| Latest release | — | latest_develop · 24 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | — | Go |
Which one should you pick?
Stash scores 78/100 against 64/100 for ResourceSpace, so it is the safer default.
Stash ships more often: 7 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for ResourceSpace.
If you want the quickest setup, Stash is easier to run; ResourceSpace needs more configuration.
Stash is growing faster right now (+300 stars in 30 days).
ResourceSpace details →Stash details →All Media Management projects →