# Resonus vs SeaweedFS

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Resonus | SeaweedFS |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 48/100 | 81/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #24 of 59 in Music Streaming | #1 of 11 in Cloud Storage |
| GitHub stars | 212 | 35 794 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +869 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 28 ✓ |
| Latest release | v0.8.4 · 20 Oct 2026 | 4.51 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

SeaweedFS scores 81/100 against 48/100 for Resonus, so it is the safer default.

SeaweedFS ships more often: 28 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for Resonus.

If you want the quickest setup, Resonus is easier to run; SeaweedFS needs more configuration.

SeaweedFS is growing faster right now (+869 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Resonus](https://selfhost.directory/project/resonus) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/resonus.md)
- [SeaweedFS](https://selfhost.directory/project/seaweedfs) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/seaweedfs.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/resonus-vs-seaweedfs