# Resonus vs SearXNG

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Resonus | SearXNG |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 48/100 | 86/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #24 of 59 in Music Streaming | #1 of 41 in Search Engines |
| GitHub stars | 212 | 38 979 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +1 367 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v0.8.4 · 20 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | GPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

SearXNG scores 86/100 against 48/100 for Resonus, so it is the safer default.

Resonus ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for SearXNG.

If you want the quickest setup, Resonus is easier to run; SearXNG needs more configuration.

SearXNG is growing faster right now (+1 367 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Resonus](https://selfhost.directory/project/resonus) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/resonus.md)
- [SearXNG](https://selfhost.directory/project/searxng) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/searxng.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/resonus-vs-searxng