# Request Tracker vs uptime-kuma

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Request Tracker | uptime-kuma |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 65/100 | 88/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #3 of 9 in Helpdesk | #3 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 1 165 | 93 077 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +6 | +1 283 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 4 | 19 ✓ |
| Latest release | rt-6.0.4 · 29 Oct 2026 ✓ | 2.5.8 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | GPL-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Perl | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

uptime-kuma scores 88/100 against 65/100 for Request Tracker, so it is the safer default.

uptime-kuma ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 4 for Request Tracker.

If you want the quickest setup, uptime-kuma is easier to run; Request Tracker needs more configuration.

uptime-kuma is growing faster right now (+1 283 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Request Tracker](https://selfhost.directory/project/request-tracker) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/request-tracker.md)
- [uptime-kuma](https://selfhost.directory/project/uptime-kuma) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/uptime-kuma.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/request-tracker-vs-uptime-kuma