# Request Tracker vs TradingAgents

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Request Tracker | TradingAgents |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 65/100 | 87/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #3 of 9 in Helpdesk | #3 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 1 164 | 118 199 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +5 | +5 840 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 11 ✓ |
| Latest release | rt-5.0.10 · 1 Jun 2026 | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | GPL-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Perl | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

TradingAgents scores 87/100 against 65/100 for Request Tracker, so it is the safer default.

TradingAgents ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for Request Tracker.

If you want the quickest setup, TradingAgents is easier to run; Request Tracker needs more configuration.

TradingAgents is growing faster right now (+5 840 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Request Tracker](https://selfhost.directory/project/request-tracker) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/request-tracker.md)
- [TradingAgents](https://selfhost.directory/project/tradingagents) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tradingagents.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/request-tracker-vs-tradingagents