# Request Tracker vs sdnext

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Request Tracker | sdnext |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 65/100 | 71/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #3 of 9 in Helpdesk | #3 of 11 in Image Generation |
| GitHub stars | 1 164 | 7 362 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +5 | +16 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | rt-5.0.10 · 1 Jun 2026 | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | GPL-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Perl | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

sdnext scores 71/100 against 65/100 for Request Tracker, so it is the safer default.

Request Tracker ships more often: 2 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for sdnext.

If you want the quickest setup, sdnext is easier to run; Request Tracker needs more configuration.

sdnext is growing faster right now (+16 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Request Tracker](https://selfhost.directory/project/request-tracker) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/request-tracker.md)
- [sdnext](https://selfhost.directory/project/sdnext) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/sdnext.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/request-tracker-vs-sdnext