# Rejourney vs temps

> Two self-hosted [Sentry alternatives](https://selfhost.directory/alternative-to/sentry), compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Rejourney | temps |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 46/100 | 58/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #16 of 27 in Analytics | #9 of 14 in Platform as a Service |
| GitHub stars | 284 | 876 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +89 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | unity-v0.1.2 · 23 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Rust |

## Which one should you pick?

temps scores 58/100 against 46/100 for Rejourney, so it is the safer default.

Rejourney ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for temps.

If you want the quickest setup, temps is easier to run; Rejourney needs more configuration.

temps is growing faster right now (+89 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Rejourney](https://selfhost.directory/project/rejourney) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/rejourney.md)
- [temps](https://selfhost.directory/project/temps) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/temps.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/rejourney-vs-temps