ReittivsTube Archivist
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Reitti | Tube Archivist | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63/100 | 72/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 6 in Location Tracking | #7 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 2 691 | 8 552 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +104 | +83 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 23 | 6 |
| Latest release | v5.8.1 · 24 Oct 2026 | v0.6.0 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Java | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Tube Archivist scores 72/100 against 63/100 for Reitti, so it is the safer default.
Reitti ships more often: 23 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Tube Archivist.
If you want the quickest setup, Reitti is easier to run; Tube Archivist needs more configuration.
Reitti details →Tube Archivist details →