# Redash vs Zammad

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Redash | Zammad |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 ✓ | 70/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 15 in Business Intelligence | #1 of 9 in Helpdesk |
| GitHub stars | 28 851 ✓ | 6 053 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +42 | +101 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v26.9.0 · 24 Sept 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | BSD-2-Clause | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Ruby |

## Which one should you pick?

Redash scores 76/100 against 70/100 for Zammad, so it is the safer default.

Redash ships more often: 2 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Zammad.

If you want the quickest setup, Redash is easier to run; Zammad needs more configuration.

Zammad is growing faster right now (+101 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Redash](https://selfhost.directory/project/redash) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/redash.md)
- [Zammad](https://selfhost.directory/project/zammad) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/zammad.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/redash-vs-zammad