RedashvsZammad
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Redash | Zammad | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 | 70/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 15 in Business Intelligence | #1 of 9 in Helpdesk |
| GitHub stars | 28 851 | 6 052 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +42 | +100 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 0 |
| Latest release | v26.9.0 · 24 Sept 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | BSD-2-Clause | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Ruby |
Which one should you pick?
Redash scores 76/100 against 70/100 for Zammad, so it is the safer default.
Redash ships more often: 2 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Zammad.
If you want the quickest setup, Redash is easier to run; Zammad needs more configuration.
Zammad is growing faster right now (+100 stars in 30 days).
Redash details →Zammad details →
Swap a project
Keep Redash, compare it with
Keep Zammad, compare it with