RedashvsWorkout.cool
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Redash | Workout.cool | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 | 66/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 15 in Business Intelligence | #2 of 11 in Fitness Tracker |
| GitHub stars | 28 851 | 8 652 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +42 | +153 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 1 |
| Latest release | v26.9.0 · 24 Sept 2026 | v1.3.2 · 7 Dec 2025 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | BSD-2-Clause | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Redash scores 76/100 against 66/100 for Workout.cool, so it is the safer default.
Redash ships more often: 2 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for Workout.cool.
If you want the quickest setup, Workout.cool is easier to run; Redash needs more configuration.
Workout.cool is growing faster right now (+153 stars in 30 days).
Redash details →Workout.cool details →
Swap a project
Keep Redash, compare it with
Keep Workout.cool, compare it with