# Redash vs Windows ARM

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Redash | Windows ARM |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 ✓ | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 15 in Business Intelligence | #7 of 15 in Virtualization |
| GitHub stars | 28 851 ✓ | 2 260 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +43 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 10 ✓ |
| Latest release | v26.9.0 · 24 Sept 2026 | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | BSD-2-Clause | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Batchfile |

## Which one should you pick?

Redash scores 76/100 against 61/100 for Windows ARM, so it is the safer default.

Windows ARM ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for Redash.

If you want the quickest setup, Redash is easier to run; Windows ARM needs more configuration.

Redash is growing faster right now (+43 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Redash](https://selfhost.directory/project/redash) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/redash.md)
- [Windows ARM](https://selfhost.directory/project/windows-arm) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/windows-arm.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/redash-vs-windows-arm