# Redash vs Warpgate

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Redash | Warpgate |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 ✓ | 75/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 15 in Business Intelligence | #11 of 78 in Security |
| GitHub stars | 28 850 ✓ | 8 159 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +42 | +199 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 33 ✓ |
| Latest release | v26.9.0 · 24 Sept 2026 | v0.30.2 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | BSD-2-Clause | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Rust |

## Which one should you pick?

Redash scores 76/100 against 75/100 for Warpgate, so it is the safer default.

Warpgate ships more often: 33 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for Redash.

If you want the quickest setup, Warpgate is easier to run; Redash needs more configuration.

Warpgate is growing faster right now (+199 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Redash](https://selfhost.directory/project/redash) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/redash.md)
- [Warpgate](https://selfhost.directory/project/warpgate) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/warpgate.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/redash-vs-warpgate