RedashvsWakapi
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Redash | Wakapi | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 15 in Business Intelligence | #4 of 11 in Time Tracking |
| GitHub stars | 28 851 | 4 465 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +42 | +30 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 11 |
| Latest release | v26.9.0 · 24 Sept 2026 | 2.18.2 · 14 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | BSD-2-Clause | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Go |
Which one should you pick?
Redash scores 76/100 against 64/100 for Wakapi, so it is the safer default.
Wakapi ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for Redash.
If you want the quickest setup, Wakapi is easier to run; Redash needs more configuration.
Redash details →Wakapi details →
Swap a project
Keep Redash, compare it with
Keep Wakapi, compare it with