# Redash vs Umami

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Redash | Umami |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 | 85/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #3 of 15 in Business Intelligence | #1 of 21 in Web analytics |
| GitHub stars | 28 851 | 39 753 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +43 | +772 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 13 ✓ |
| Latest release | v26.9.0 · 24 Sept 2026 | v3.4.1 · 23 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | BSD-2-Clause | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Umami scores 85/100 against 76/100 for Redash, so it is the safer default.

Umami ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for Redash.

If you want the quickest setup, Umami is easier to run; Redash needs more configuration.

Umami is growing faster right now (+772 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Redash](https://selfhost.directory/project/redash) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/redash.md)
- [Umami](https://selfhost.directory/project/umami) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/umami.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/redash-vs-umami