# Redash vs TradingAgents

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Redash | TradingAgents |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 | 87/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #3 of 15 in Business Intelligence | #3 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 28 850 | 117 928 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +42 | +5 569 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 11 ✓ |
| Latest release | v26.9.0 · 24 Sept 2026 | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | BSD-2-Clause | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

TradingAgents scores 87/100 against 76/100 for Redash, so it is the safer default.

TradingAgents ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for Redash.

TradingAgents is growing faster right now (+5 569 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Redash](https://selfhost.directory/project/redash) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/redash.md)
- [TradingAgents](https://selfhost.directory/project/tradingagents) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tradingagents.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/redash-vs-tradingagents