Redashvsrsyslog
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Redash | rsyslog | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 | 67/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 15 in Business Intelligence | #2 of 8 in Logging |
| GitHub stars | 28 851 | 2 344 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +42 | +8 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 4 |
| Latest release | v26.9.0 · 24 Sept 2026 | v8.2610.0 · 20 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | BSD-2-Clause | LGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | C |
Which one should you pick?
Redash scores 76/100 against 67/100 for rsyslog, so it is the safer default.
rsyslog ships more often: 4 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for Redash.
If you want the quickest setup, Redash is easier to run; rsyslog needs more configuration.
Redash is growing faster right now (+42 stars in 30 days).
Redash details →rsyslog details →
Swap a project
Keep Redash, compare it with
Keep rsyslog, compare it with