# recyclarr vs sdnext

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | recyclarr | sdnext |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 64/100 | 71/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #15 of 142 in Media Management | #3 of 11 in Image Generation |
| GitHub stars | 2 146 | 7 362 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +27 ✓ | +16 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v8.8.1 · 28 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | C# | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

sdnext scores 71/100 against 64/100 for recyclarr, so it is the safer default.

recyclarr ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for sdnext.

If you want the quickest setup, recyclarr is easier to run; sdnext needs more configuration.

## Details

- [recyclarr](https://selfhost.directory/project/recyclarr) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/recyclarr.md)
- [sdnext](https://selfhost.directory/project/sdnext) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/sdnext.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/recyclarr-vs-sdnext