# rebacklogs vs Typst

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | rebacklogs | Typst |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 43/100 | 82/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #36 of 45 in Project Management | #1 of 2 in Publishing |
| GitHub stars | 184 | 56 868 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +139 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 ✓ | 5 |
| Latest release | v4.3.3 · 6 Apr 2026 | v0.15.1 · 17 Jul 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Ruby | Rust |

## Which one should you pick?

Typst scores 82/100 against 43/100 for rebacklogs, so it is the safer default.

rebacklogs ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for Typst.

If you want the quickest setup, Typst is easier to run; rebacklogs needs more configuration.

Typst is growing faster right now (+139 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [rebacklogs](https://selfhost.directory/project/rebacklogs) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/rebacklogs.md)
- [Typst](https://selfhost.directory/project/typst) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/typst.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/rebacklogs-vs-typst