# rebacklogs vs Text Generation WebUI

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | rebacklogs | Text Generation WebUI |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 43/100 | 76/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #36 of 45 in Project Management | #6 of 69 in AI Chat |
| GitHub stars | 184 | 47 724 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +24 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 10 |
| Latest release | v4.3.3 · 6 Apr 2026 | v4.9 · 20 May 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Ruby | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Text Generation WebUI scores 76/100 against 43/100 for rebacklogs, so it is the safer default.

If you want the quickest setup, Text Generation WebUI is easier to run; rebacklogs needs more configuration.

Text Generation WebUI is growing faster right now (+24 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [rebacklogs](https://selfhost.directory/project/rebacklogs) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/rebacklogs.md)
- [Text Generation WebUI](https://selfhost.directory/project/text-generation-webui) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/text-generation-webui.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/rebacklogs-vs-text-generation-webui