# rebacklogs vs Stirling-PDF

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | rebacklogs | Stirling-PDF |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 43/100 | 87/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #36 of 45 in Project Management | #1 of 46 in Document Management |
| GitHub stars | 184 | 95 261 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +2 348 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 25 ✓ |
| Latest release | v4.3.3 · 6 Apr 2026 | v3.2.2 · 24 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Other |
| Main language | Ruby | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Stirling-PDF scores 87/100 against 43/100 for rebacklogs, so it is the safer default.

Stirling-PDF ships more often: 25 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for rebacklogs.

Stirling-PDF is growing faster right now (+2 348 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [rebacklogs](https://selfhost.directory/project/rebacklogs) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/rebacklogs.md)
- [Stirling-PDF](https://selfhost.directory/project/stirling-pdf) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/stirling-pdf.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/rebacklogs-vs-stirling-pdf