# rebacklogs vs SRS

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | rebacklogs | SRS |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 43/100 | 78/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #36 of 45 in Project Management | #4 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 184 | 29 390 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +111 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 13 ✓ |
| Latest release | v4.3.3 · 6 Apr 2026 | v7.0-a3 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Ruby | C |

## Which one should you pick?

SRS scores 78/100 against 43/100 for rebacklogs, so it is the safer default.

SRS ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for rebacklogs.

SRS is growing faster right now (+111 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [rebacklogs](https://selfhost.directory/project/rebacklogs) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/rebacklogs.md)
- [SRS](https://selfhost.directory/project/srs) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/srs.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/rebacklogs-vs-srs