# rebacklogs vs Resume-Matcher

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | rebacklogs | Resume-Matcher |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 43/100 | 81/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #36 of 45 in Project Management | #1 of 12 in Document Processing |
| GitHub stars | 184 | 28 916 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +408 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 ✓ | 5 |
| Latest release | v4.3.3 · 6 Apr 2026 | v1.4.0 · 21 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Ruby | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Resume-Matcher scores 81/100 against 43/100 for rebacklogs, so it is the safer default.

rebacklogs ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for Resume-Matcher.

If you want the quickest setup, Resume-Matcher is easier to run; rebacklogs needs more configuration.

Resume-Matcher is growing faster right now (+408 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [rebacklogs](https://selfhost.directory/project/rebacklogs) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/rebacklogs.md)
- [Resume-Matcher](https://selfhost.directory/project/resume-matcher) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/resume-matcher.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/rebacklogs-vs-resume-matcher