ReadMeABookvsWorkout.cool
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| ReadMeABook | Workout.cool | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 64/100 | 66/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 15 in Audiobook Management | #2 of 11 in Fitness Tracker |
| GitHub stars | 1 033 | 8 651 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +65 | +156 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 21 | 1 |
| Latest release | v1.2.12 · 27 Oct 2026 | v1.3.2 · 7 Dec 2025 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Workout.cool scores 66/100 against 64/100 for ReadMeABook, so it is the safer default.
ReadMeABook ships more often: 21 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for Workout.cool.
If you want the quickest setup, Workout.cool is easier to run; ReadMeABook needs more configuration.
Workout.cool is growing faster right now (+156 stars in 30 days).
ReadMeABook details →Workout.cool details →
Swap a project
Keep ReadMeABook, compare it with
Keep Workout.cool, compare it with