# ReadMeABook vs UUSEC WAF

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | ReadMeABook | UUSEC WAF |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 64/100 ✓ | 59/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 15 in Audiobook Management | #2 of 3 in Web Application Firewall |
| GitHub stars | 1 033 | 1 718 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +65 ✓ | +6 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 21 ✓ | 9 |
| Latest release | v1.2.12 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ | v7.2.6 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | BSD-2-Clause |
| Main language | Typescript | Shell |

## Which one should you pick?

ReadMeABook scores 64/100 against 59/100 for UUSEC WAF, so it is the safer default.

ReadMeABook ships more often: 21 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for UUSEC WAF.

If you want the quickest setup, UUSEC WAF is easier to run; ReadMeABook needs more configuration.

ReadMeABook is growing faster right now (+65 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [ReadMeABook](https://selfhost.directory/project/readmeabook) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/readmeabook.md)
- [UUSEC WAF](https://selfhost.directory/project/uusec-waf) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/uusec-waf.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/readmeabook-vs-uusec-waf