# ReadMeABook vs unsloth

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | ReadMeABook | unsloth |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 64/100 | 85/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #3 of 15 in Audiobook Management | #1 of 7 in Local AI |
| GitHub stars | 1 033 | 78 697 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +65 | +2 040 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 21 ✓ | 2 |
| Latest release | v1.2.12 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ | prebuilt-wheels-cu13 · 27 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

unsloth scores 85/100 against 64/100 for ReadMeABook, so it is the safer default.

ReadMeABook ships more often: 21 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for unsloth.

If you want the quickest setup, unsloth is easier to run; ReadMeABook needs more configuration.

unsloth is growing faster right now (+2 040 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [ReadMeABook](https://selfhost.directory/project/readmeabook) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/readmeabook.md)
- [unsloth](https://selfhost.directory/project/unsloth) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/unsloth.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/readmeabook-vs-unsloth