# ReadMeABook vs tunesynctool

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | ReadMeABook | tunesynctool |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 64/100 ✓ | 41/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 15 in Audiobook Management | #43 of 59 in Music Streaming |
| GitHub stars | 1 033 ✓ | 158 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +65 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 21 ✓ | 1 |
| Latest release | v1.2.12 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ | v1.2.2 · 6 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | GPL-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

ReadMeABook scores 64/100 against 41/100 for tunesynctool, so it is the safer default.

ReadMeABook ships more often: 21 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for tunesynctool.

ReadMeABook is growing faster right now (+65 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [ReadMeABook](https://selfhost.directory/project/readmeabook) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/readmeabook.md)
- [tunesynctool](https://selfhost.directory/project/tunesynctool) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tunesynctool.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/readmeabook-vs-tunesynctool