ReadMeABookvsTimescaleDB
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| ReadMeABook | TimescaleDB | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 64/100 | 77/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 15 in Audiobook Management | #5 of 40 in Database Management |
| GitHub stars | 1 033 | 23 773 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +63 | +188 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 21 | 19 |
| Latest release | v1.2.12 · 27 Oct 2026 | 2.31.0 · 20 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Other |
| Main language | Typescript | C |
Which one should you pick?
TimescaleDB scores 77/100 against 64/100 for ReadMeABook, so it is the safer default.
ReadMeABook ships more often: 21 stable releases in the past year, against 19 for TimescaleDB.
If you want the quickest setup, TimescaleDB is easier to run; ReadMeABook needs more configuration.
TimescaleDB is growing faster right now (+188 stars in 30 days).
ReadMeABook details →TimescaleDB details →
Swap a project
Keep ReadMeABook, compare it with
Keep TimescaleDB, compare it with