ReadMeABookvsSyslog-ng
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| ReadMeABook | Syslog-ng | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 64/100 | 66/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 15 in Audiobook Management | #3 of 8 in Logging |
| GitHub stars | 1 033 | 2 385 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +65 | +9 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 21 | 2 |
| Latest release | v1.2.12 · 27 Oct 2026 | syslog-ng-4.12.0 · 16 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Other |
| Main language | Typescript | C |
Which one should you pick?
Syslog-ng scores 66/100 against 64/100 for ReadMeABook, so it is the safer default.
ReadMeABook ships more often: 21 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for Syslog-ng.
If you want the quickest setup, Syslog-ng is easier to run; ReadMeABook needs more configuration.
ReadMeABook is growing faster right now (+65 stars in 30 days).
ReadMeABook details →Syslog-ng details →
Swap a project
Keep ReadMeABook, compare it with
Keep Syslog-ng, compare it with