# ReadMeABook vs SRS

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | ReadMeABook | SRS |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 64/100 | 78/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #3 of 15 in Audiobook Management | #4 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 1 033 | 29 388 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +65 | +111 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 21 ✓ | 13 |
| Latest release | v1.2.12 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ | v7.0-a3 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | C |

## Which one should you pick?

SRS scores 78/100 against 64/100 for ReadMeABook, so it is the safer default.

ReadMeABook ships more often: 21 stable releases in the past year, against 13 for SRS.

If you want the quickest setup, SRS is easier to run; ReadMeABook needs more configuration.

## Details

- [ReadMeABook](https://selfhost.directory/project/readmeabook) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/readmeabook.md)
- [SRS](https://selfhost.directory/project/srs) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/srs.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/readmeabook-vs-srs