ReadMeABookvsSRS
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| ReadMeABook | SRS | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 64/100 | 78/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 15 in Audiobook Management | #4 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 1 033 | 29 388 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +65 | +111 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 21 | 13 |
| Latest release | v1.2.12 · 27 Oct 2026 | v7.0-a3 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | C |
Which one should you pick?
SRS scores 78/100 against 64/100 for ReadMeABook, so it is the safer default.
ReadMeABook ships more often: 21 stable releases in the past year, against 13 for SRS.
If you want the quickest setup, SRS is easier to run; ReadMeABook needs more configuration.
ReadMeABook details →SRS details →
Swap a project
Keep ReadMeABook, compare it with
Keep SRS, compare it with