ReadMeABookvsSnapcast
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| ReadMeABook | Snapcast | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 64/100 | 72/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 15 in Audiobook Management | #1 of 14 in Audio Streaming |
| GitHub stars | 1 033 | 8 039 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +63 | +149 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 21 | 1 |
| Latest release | v1.2.12 · 27 Oct 2026 | v0.35.0 · 10 Mar 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | C |
Which one should you pick?
Snapcast scores 72/100 against 64/100 for ReadMeABook, so it is the safer default.
ReadMeABook ships more often: 21 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for Snapcast.
If you want the quickest setup, Snapcast is easier to run; ReadMeABook needs more configuration.
Snapcast is growing faster right now (+149 stars in 30 days).
ReadMeABook details →Snapcast details →
Swap a project
Keep ReadMeABook, compare it with
Keep Snapcast, compare it with