ReadMeABookvsSeaweedFS
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| ReadMeABook | SeaweedFS | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 64/100 | 81/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 15 in Audiobook Management | #1 of 11 in Cloud Storage |
| GitHub stars | 1 033 | 35 791 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +65 | +866 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 21 | 28 |
| Latest release | v1.2.12 · 27 Oct 2026 | 4.51 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |
Which one should you pick?
SeaweedFS scores 81/100 against 64/100 for ReadMeABook, so it is the safer default.
SeaweedFS ships more often: 28 stable releases in the past year, against 21 for ReadMeABook.
If you want the quickest setup, SeaweedFS is easier to run; ReadMeABook needs more configuration.
SeaweedFS is growing faster right now (+866 stars in 30 days).
ReadMeABook details →SeaweedFS details →
Swap a project
Keep ReadMeABook, compare it with
Keep SeaweedFS, compare it with