# ReadMeABook vs SearXNG

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | ReadMeABook | SearXNG |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 64/100 | 86/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #3 of 15 in Audiobook Management | #1 of 41 in Search Engines |
| GitHub stars | 1 033 | 38 943 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +65 | +1 377 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 21 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v1.2.12 · 27 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

SearXNG scores 86/100 against 64/100 for ReadMeABook, so it is the safer default.

ReadMeABook ships more often: 21 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for SearXNG.

If you want the quickest setup, SearXNG is easier to run; ReadMeABook needs more configuration.

SearXNG is growing faster right now (+1 377 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [ReadMeABook](https://selfhost.directory/project/readmeabook) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/readmeabook.md)
- [SearXNG](https://selfhost.directory/project/searxng) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/searxng.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/readmeabook-vs-searxng