ReadMeABookvsscalar
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| ReadMeABook | scalar | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 64/100 | 76/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 15 in Audiobook Management | #3 of 13 in API |
| GitHub stars | 1 033 | 16 336 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +63 | +147 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 21 | 46 |
| Latest release | v1.2.12 · 27 Oct 2026 | release-2026-10-28-0d01943 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
scalar scores 76/100 against 64/100 for ReadMeABook, so it is the safer default.
scalar ships more often: 46 stable releases in the past year, against 21 for ReadMeABook.
If you want the quickest setup, scalar is easier to run; ReadMeABook needs more configuration.
scalar is growing faster right now (+147 stars in 30 days).
ReadMeABook details →scalar details →
Swap a project
Keep ReadMeABook, compare it with
Keep scalar, compare it with