# ReadMeABook vs SandBase Harness

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | ReadMeABook | SandBase Harness |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 64/100 ✓ | 39/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 15 in Audiobook Management | #169 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 1 034 ✓ | 636 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +64 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 21 ✓ | 9 |
| Latest release | v1.2.12 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ | v0.3.8 · 30 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

ReadMeABook scores 64/100 against 39/100 for SandBase Harness, so it is the safer default.

ReadMeABook ships more often: 21 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for SandBase Harness.

If you want the quickest setup, SandBase Harness is easier to run; ReadMeABook needs more configuration.

ReadMeABook is growing faster right now (+64 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [ReadMeABook](https://selfhost.directory/project/readmeabook) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/readmeabook.md)
- [SandBase Harness](https://selfhost.directory/project/sandbase-harness) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/sandbase-harness.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/readmeabook-vs-sandbase-harness