ReadMeABookvsrunitor
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| ReadMeABook | runitor | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 64/100 | 49/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 15 in Audiobook Management | #25 of 51 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 1 033 | 361 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +63 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 21 | 4 |
| Latest release | v1.2.12 · 27 Oct 2026 | v1.4.1-build.6 · 17 Mar 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | 0BSD |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |
Which one should you pick?
ReadMeABook scores 64/100 against 49/100 for runitor, so it is the safer default.
ReadMeABook ships more often: 21 stable releases in the past year, against 4 for runitor.
If you want the quickest setup, runitor is easier to run; ReadMeABook needs more configuration.
ReadMeABook is growing faster right now (+63 stars in 30 days).
ReadMeABook details →runitor details →
Swap a project
Keep ReadMeABook, compare it with
Keep runitor, compare it with