# ReadMeABook vs rpi-mqtt-monitor

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | ReadMeABook | rpi-mqtt-monitor |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 64/100 ✓ | 51/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 15 in Audiobook Management | #58 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 1 033 ✓ | 328 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +63 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 21 ✓ | 8 |
| Latest release | v1.2.12 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ | 1.4.3 · 18 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

ReadMeABook scores 64/100 against 51/100 for rpi-mqtt-monitor, so it is the safer default.

ReadMeABook ships more often: 21 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for rpi-mqtt-monitor.

If you want the quickest setup, rpi-mqtt-monitor is easier to run; ReadMeABook needs more configuration.

ReadMeABook is growing faster right now (+63 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [ReadMeABook](https://selfhost.directory/project/readmeabook) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/readmeabook.md)
- [rpi-mqtt-monitor](https://selfhost.directory/project/rpi-mqtt-monitor) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/rpi-mqtt-monitor.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/readmeabook-vs-rpi-mqtt-monitor